MCD-SM escreveu:Sintra escreveu:MCD-SM escreveu:Galera,
para não abrir outro tópico, seria possível alguém fazer um comparativo entre o Rafale e Typhoon no estágio atual e perspectivas futuras?
Veja aqui:
http://defesabrasil.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9408 E já agora, caso tenha acesso, encontra um comparativo bastante extenso entre esses dois caça na Air International deste mês.
não tenho...e quais são as conclusões?
Obrigado.
Maior quantidade de combustivel no RAFALE, maior capacidade aerodinâmica no Tiffie... Basicamente isto.
Excertos do artigo
"Typhoon enjoys better performance and superior supersonic agility, while the Rafale has significantly better payload/range capability, and a better ‘ride’ at low level."
"In talking to French, British and Singaporean pilots who have flown the aircraft, it soon becomes clear that Typhoon and Rafale are relatively evenly matched, each enjoying advantages and disadvantages. Rafale has a good low level ride and a really significant payload/range capability, and is in frontline service with a wider range of capabilities and weapons options. Typhoon enjoys an equally significant performance advantage, and has substantially better radar performance.
But the key difference between the Typhoon and Rafale is both the most obvious to anyone who flies both aircraft, and also the most difficult to quantify. This differentiating factor is the effectiveness and efficiency of the Man Machine Interface. This is quite different to the physical design and layout of the cockpit, of course.
If you looked into the cockpits of Rafale and Typhoon on an airshow static display, you might conclude that Rafale’s cockpit was better designed, with its airy feel and big, modern-looking displays. But comparing cockpits in this way is of limited usefulness – it’s like comparing TV sets without turning them on to look at the picture and to compare the functionality of the remote control, and the programming of the video. The better looking TV ‘box’ might well have an inferior picture and be a pig to use.
And the Man Machine Interface is of crucial importance in reducing pilot workload, giving the pilot the best possible situational awareness, and in allowing him to operate his weapons system and sensors to greatest effect."
Typhoon’s planned advanced capabilities would now accelerate ahead" was "an assumption too far, in this writer’s opinion, as it takes too little account of French Government commitment to the Rafale programme, and of its determination to see the programme through to a successful conclusion."
"At the end of the day, it is perhaps enough to conclude that after a bumpy ride, and with an occasionally rocky road ahead, both aircraft will successfully fulfil the slightly different visions of their creators.
Every multi-role aircraft inevitably represents a compromise between conflicting requirements, and both Rafale and Typhoon reflect the slightly different needs of their original customers.
Rafale is arguably the best possible solution to French requirements (as it was always designed to be) and has better range, endurance, and a better low level ride than its European rival. Though it has not won any export orders so far, Rafale may still find favour with customers who require their multi-role tactical fighter to be optimised for long range air-to-ground and strike missions. While similarly designed as a swing role tactical fighter, Typhoon, by contrast, is optimised more towards air-to-air requirements, and offers a small but significant performance advantage, better supersonic agility, and a superior man machine interface."
Abraços
Budweiser 'beer' is like making love in a canoe - 'F***** close to water'...
.jpg)
