Incêndio no HMCS Windsor

Assuntos em discussão: Marinha do Brasil e marinhas estrangeiras, forças de superfície e submarinas, aviação naval e tecnologia naval.

Moderador: Conselho de Moderação

Mensagem
Autor
JNSA
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 720
Registrado em: Dom Dez 12, 2004 9:28 pm
Localização: Lisboa, Portugal

Incêndio no HMCS Windsor

#1 Mensagem por JNSA » Ter Nov 01, 2005 11:58 am

Fire on 2nd Canadian sub
Last Updated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:52:29 EST
CBC News

The Canadian navy has confirmed that the troubled fleet of submarines purchased from Britain has suffered another fire, slightly more than a year after a blaze crippled HMCS Chicoutimi and led to the death of one sailor.

A navy spokesperson in Halifax said HMCS Windsor was submerged off the Nova Scotia coast on Sunday when a transformer meltdown was reported.

A small fire created smoke in the submarine and the crew went to immediate emergency stations.

The submarine rose to what the navy calls "a safe depth" and extinguished the fire.

No sailors were injured and the Windsor remains at sea.

The vessel is the navy's only operational submarine.

Three other Victoria-class submarines purchased by the Canadian navy from the Royal Navy in 1998 are in repair or retrofit.


In October 2004, a fire broke out on Chicoutimi as it was crossing the Atlantic, leading to the death of Lieut. Chris Saunders and injuring eight others.

In May 5, 2005, a Canadian naval board of inquiry released a 700-page report on the accident.


fonte: http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/10/31/chicoutimi-051031.html

Embora a decisão de não comprar os Upholder/Victoria para a Marinha Portuguesa tenha sido muito criticada por alguns, em retrospectiva, só podemos dar graças por não termos ficado com este barrete!!... :shock:

De quatro submarinos, só um está operacional, e após este incidente, mesmo esse terá provavelmente de ser reparado e submetido a inspecções...

Os U-209PN podem ser mais caros, mas em princípio não devem sofrer dos mesmos males dos Upholder [bate na madeira...] :roll:




Avatar do usuário
Lauro Melo
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 3312
Registrado em: Qui Jun 24, 2004 10:36 pm
Localização: Rio de Janeiro - RJ
Contato:

#2 Mensagem por Lauro Melo » Ter Nov 01, 2005 12:04 pm

Parece-me ser o 2º Grave acidente deste modelo no Canadá.




"Os guerreiros não caem se ajoelham e levantam ainda mais fortes."
TOG: 22 anos de garra, determinação e respeito.
Avatar do usuário
talharim
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 9831
Registrado em: Sex Mai 07, 2004 11:40 pm
Localização: Santos-SP
Agradeceram: 212 vezes

#3 Mensagem por talharim » Ter Nov 01, 2005 12:08 pm

Por favor gente,os ingleses são um dos melhores construtores de submarinos do mundo.

Eu me recuso a acreditar que a classe Upholder é um fracasso !

Para mim isto está parecendo incompetência da Marinha Canadense.




JNSA
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 720
Registrado em: Dom Dez 12, 2004 9:28 pm
Localização: Lisboa, Portugal

#4 Mensagem por JNSA » Ter Nov 01, 2005 12:33 pm

talharim escreveu:Por favor gente,os ingleses são um dos melhores construtores de submarinos do mundo.

Eu me recuso a acreditar que a classe Upholder é um fracasso !

Para mim isto está parecendo incompetência da Marinha Canadense.


Os ingleses têm alguns dos melhores submarinistas do mundo, sem dúvida. Quanto à construção de submarinos, não sou especialista portanto não me quero alargar na matéria. Mas se atendermos apenas às últimas décadas, há países com muito mais experiência, pelo menos no que concerne a SSK's.

Se procurar no mesmo site do qual a notícia foi retirada, encontra uma breve história dos submarinos na Marinha Canadiana. Deixo-lhe aqui alguns excertos:

1998:
Canadian Forces announces it has purchased four Upholder-class Royal Navy submarines, which were decommissioned in 1993 when the U.K. decided to focus solely on nuclear subs.


(Um tão longo tempo de paragem não faz bem nenhum ao equipamento)

2002:
Windsor leaves Halifax for a planned two-week mission, but is forced to turn back after salt water seeps into a hydraulic motor. Canadian Forces reveals that Victoria has a dent in its hull the size of a pizza, as a result of a collision that occurred before the navy took over the sub. The Royal Navy agrees to co-operate in an investigation of the dent. The Canadian navy says cracked diesel exhaust valves on all the subs may have to be replaced.


2003:
HMCS Victoria sails to Esquimalt, B.C., from Halifax via the Panama Canal, re-establishing Canada's submarine presence in the Pacific Ocean, lost when the Rainbow was decommissioned in 1974.

An official with the Defence Department says the lease-to-purchase plan for the four new subs would cost an estimated $897 million, up from their original estimate of $750 million, because of the subs' structural problems.


2004:
On its maiden voyage as a Canadian vessel, a fire breaks out in the electrical equipment room of HMCS Chicoutimi causing "extensive damage to cabling," says Commodore Tyrone Pile, commander of the Canadian Fleet Atlantic. Nine members of the crew suffer smoke inhalation. Three crewmen are transferred by Royal Navy helicopter to a hospital in Ireland. Lieut. Chris Saunders, 32, dies on the helicopter.

The navy orders the three other Victoria-class submarines to dock while an inquiry takes place to determine the cause of the Chicoutimi fire. Other than the few months in 2000 before the Victoria was commissioned, it is the first time since 1961 the Canadian navy has been without an active submarine.


Será que, depois de receber os Upholder, a Marinha Canadiana deixou de saber operar submarinos?... Posso estar enganado, mas parece-me que a origem dos problemas não está apenas, nem sobretudo, no lado Canadiano...




Avatar do usuário
VICTOR
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4238
Registrado em: Qua Fev 19, 2003 5:50 pm
Localização: Curitiba
Agradeceu: 3 vezes

#5 Mensagem por VICTOR » Ter Nov 01, 2005 1:48 pm

Parece que foi um transformador que queimou.

Eh chato dizer, mas esses Upholders estao se revelando uma roubada. Acho que o JNSA apontou corretamente a longa estocagem como um dos principais fatores.

Os canadenses ja auto-ridicularizam suas Forcas, imagine com essa agora...




Carlos Eduardo

Podcast F1 Brasil
Avatar do usuário
VICTOR
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4238
Registrado em: Qua Fev 19, 2003 5:50 pm
Localização: Curitiba
Agradeceu: 3 vezes

#6 Mensagem por VICTOR » Ter Nov 01, 2005 1:49 pm

Transformer melts but sub remains at sea
Tuesday, November 1, 2005 Page A11

Halifax -- One of the vessels in Canada's troubled fleet of submarines remained at sea yesterday Mon despite another electrical glitch that caused a transformer to melt and smoke in the boat's engine room.

The navy said the crew of HMCS Windsor was brought "to emergency stations" during the incident Sunday morning.

There were no injuries and the navy said the sub remained at sea and fully operational.

The navy, in a release, said the problem was isolated to the transformer, which was replaced. CP

The Globe and Mail - Toronto




Carlos Eduardo

Podcast F1 Brasil
Avatar do usuário
VICTOR
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4238
Registrado em: Qua Fev 19, 2003 5:50 pm
Localização: Curitiba
Agradeceu: 3 vezes

#7 Mensagem por VICTOR » Ter Nov 01, 2005 1:58 pm

Blaze damages navy's last working submarine
HMCS Windsor fire confined to air conditioning system


Comes 13 months after Chicoutimi's tragic maiden voyage
KELLY TOUGHILL
ATLANTIC CANADA BUREAU

HALIFAX—A transformer aboard the Canadian Navy's last working submarine caught fire this week, just 13 months after a fire aboard her sister ship killed one sailor, injured eight and sparked a national controversy.

Crew aboard HMCS Windsor smelled burning plastic while the ship was submerged during a training exercise Sunday morning. According to a terse four-paragraph statement issued by navy officials, white smoke drifted into a forward engine compartment and crews were called to emergency stations.

The electrical blaze was isolated to a part of the air-conditioning system and snuffed out quickly. There were no injuries, and the ship has not been called back to port.

Aspects of the fire and the navy's response to it were eerily similar to the tragedy that killed Lieut. Chris Saunders, 32, in October 2004, aboard the maiden voyage of HMCS Chicoutimi.

Both blazes were caused by electrical problems. In the case of HMCS Chicoutimi, water flooded in from an open hatch and sloshed over power cables. That created an explosion that blew holes in the deck of the captain's cabin, sending smoke throughout the ship. The cause of Sunday's electrical fire that melted a transformer in the cooling system of HMCS Windsor is under investigation.

The navy was sharply criticized for its management of the Chicoutimi crisis, particularly because it told the public everything was fine when in fact Chicoutimi was drifting without power in the Irish Sea with a critically injured sailor on board.

This week, the navy waited more than 24 hours to notify the public of the blaze aboard HMCS Windsor, and could not be reached to comment on questions such as where Windsor was when the crisis occurred, or how it has affected ship operations.

The Chicoutimi crisis focused public attention on a controversial submarine program that has drawn fierce criticism since the start. Canada bought four used diesel submarines from Britain for $891 million. It took years to refit the submarines, and millions more than military officials had expected.

The submarines, which had been mothballed by the British, repeatedly broke down, and some sailors said they were afraid to sail them.

The Chicoutimi was the last of the four to set sail from Scotland for Canada. The fire broke out on Oct. 5 after a freak wave dumped 2,000 litres of water down the conning tower. The fire left the ship drifting in heavy seas. Saunders died the next day as he was being evacuated to hospital.

Two of Chicoutimi's sister ships, HMCS Windsor and HMCS Victoria, were recalled to port just days later, pending the outcome of the investigation. A third ship, HMCS Cornerbrook, was already at dock undergoing repairs when the others were recalled.

A board of inquiry found no one to blame for the blaze, calling it a freak accident that could not have been predicted.

A Commons defence committee also investigated. It blasted the submarine program for political interference.

The submarines were kept at the dock for more than seven months. Just moments after releasing the results of the investigation last May, Vice-Admiral Bruce MacLean said the other ships would head back to sea.

"The navy needs to regain the trust of Canadians in this program," he told reporters at the time.

"These are safe and superior submarines."

Victoria, however, returned to port just one month later, where she was sent for a repair that is expected to take two years.

The Cornerbrook is still going through a retrofit in Halifax. Repairs on fire-damaged Chicoutimi will begin next year and are expected to last into 2007.

That leaves HMCS Windsor as the sole submarine capable of training crews that will be used throughout the program.

Toronto Star




Carlos Eduardo

Podcast F1 Brasil
Avatar do usuário
Charlie Golf
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 1541
Registrado em: Sex Mai 27, 2005 5:55 pm
Localização: Almada, Portugal
Agradeceram: 1 vez
Contato:

#8 Mensagem por Charlie Golf » Ter Nov 01, 2005 3:16 pm

Os ex-"Upholder" continuam a dar problemas? :?

Pelo menos esses subs não vieram cá parar (como era a intenção de alguns "iluminados" favoráveis à sua aquisição). [010]




Um abraço,
Carlos Jorge Gomes

"SIC ITUR AD ASTRA"
(Deste modo alcançamos as estrelas)
Avatar do usuário
P44
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 55371
Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
Localização: O raio que vos parta
Agradeceu: 2783 vezes
Agradeceram: 2456 vezes

#9 Mensagem por P44 » Qua Nov 30, 2005 10:02 am

Marine canadienne
La Marine Canadienne face au désastre des Upholder britanniques

:arrow: http://www.meretmarine.com/article.cfm?id=239

(agradecimentos ao Spectral, não conhecia este site :wink: )




Triste sina ter nascido português 👎
Avatar do usuário
pt
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 3131
Registrado em: Qua Out 01, 2003 6:42 pm
Localização: Setubal - Portugal
Agradeceu: 1 vez
Agradeceram: 161 vezes
Contato:

#10 Mensagem por pt » Qua Nov 30, 2005 10:14 am

Cá para mim, este azar todo é trabalho :twisted:




Raul Neto
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 1096
Registrado em: Seg Jan 10, 2005 4:33 pm

#11 Mensagem por Raul Neto » Qua Nov 30, 2005 10:53 am

    Seria uma descrédito e uma humilhação para o consórcio fabricante dos novos sub se dessem barracadas dessas.

    Mas como diz o amigo JNSA, bate na Madeira 3 vezes, e acrescento mandem o Alexandrino hipnotizá-los na cerimónia de entrega :lol: :wink: (nunca se sabe :roll: )




O tempo acende as paixões verdadeiras e apaga as superficiais.
Avatar do usuário
pt
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 3131
Registrado em: Qua Out 01, 2003 6:42 pm
Localização: Setubal - Portugal
Agradeceu: 1 vez
Agradeceram: 161 vezes
Contato:

#12 Mensagem por pt » Qua Nov 30, 2005 11:57 am

Deviam recorrer ao terreiro da Mãe Acácia.
Resultado garantido




Raul Neto
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 1096
Registrado em: Seg Jan 10, 2005 4:33 pm

#13 Mensagem por Raul Neto » Qua Nov 30, 2005 12:14 pm

    [018]




O tempo acende as paixões verdadeiras e apaga as superficiais.
Avatar do usuário
Rui Elias Maltez
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 13951
Registrado em: Ter Nov 16, 2004 1:38 pm
Localização: Sintra, Portugal
Agradeceram: 1 vez
Contato:

#14 Mensagem por Rui Elias Maltez » Qua Nov 30, 2005 12:54 pm

JNSA:

Embora a decisão de não comprar os Upholder/Victoria para a Marinha Portuguesa tenha sido muito criticada por alguns, em retrospectiva, só podemos dar graças por não termos ficado com este barrete!!... :shock:


Charlie:

Pelo menos esses subs não vieram cá parar (como era a intenção de alguns "iluminados" favoráveis à sua aquisição).


:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Já sei que é boca para mim, mas não precisam de bater tanto no ceguinho. :oops:

Começo a reconhecer que de facto estão a dar muitos problemas.

Mas é facil falar depois.

Será que algum dos muitos foristas do DB já adivinhava que eles iriam dar problemas antes da sua ocorrência? :wink:




Imagem
Responder