Depois da leitura, não restará dúvida de que a FAB queria o SH.
Junker escreveu:No tópico do JF-17 eu recortei tudo, aqui vou deixar os cables inteiros, especificamente sobre o F-X2:
Antecipação da SL porque a END iria desclassificar o F-16 e o F-18, e as supostas razões para desclassificar os russos (além de já terem dito de pronto que o F-18 "era justamente o que eles procuravam", que tipo de comprador faz isso?):"Yes, but...", FMS e financiamento que já deram dor de cabeça, AIM-9X não disponível... É um plantação de mandioca completa na "horta" do "Brazil":2008, Aug 5
Brazil's Next Generation Fighter Competition Takes Off — Embassy Brasilia (Brazil)
Reference id: 08BRASILIA1061
Cable time: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:57 UTC
Origin: Embassy Brasilia
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Published on: 11 Jul 2011 (original), 1 Sep 2011 (diff) (now)
Highlight:
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRASILIA 001061 SIPDIS STATE FOR WHA, PM/RSAT, USDOC FOR MAC/ADRISCOLL/LFUSSELL/MCAMERON, FCS/PWILLIAMS E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/01/2018 TAGS: PREL [External Political Relations], MARR [Military and Defense Arrangements], BR [Brazil], ETTC [Trade and Technology Controls] SUBJECT: BRAZIL'S NEXT GENERATION FIGHTER COMPETITION TAKES OFF REF: BRASILIA 847 Classified By: DCM Lisa Kubiske. Reason: 1.5(d)
¶1. (C) SUMMARY. Meeting the July 31, deadline for responses to Brazil's request for information (RFI) on a next generation fighter aircraft (FX2), Boeing and Lockheed Martin submitted their proposals on July 30 and 31 respectively. The Brazilian Air Force (BRAF) is expected to review the proposals of the six competing aircraft and announce a short list by the end of August. As noted in reftel, benefits to the Brazilian economy, particularly its aerospace industry will be decisive in the fighter competition. Both U.S. companies have included substantial packages for industrial cooperation but are taking widely different approaches. Both expect strong competition from the French, Russian and Swedish competitors and will seek appropriate USG advocacy. Post strongly supports providing advocacy for US competitors once approved by Washington agencies. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (C) BOEING. Boeing provided information on its F18 Super Hornet, highlighting the aircraft's performance record and potential for upgrades to keep it among the world's leading combat aircraft for the next several decades. Boeing's proposal included an extensive section on the technology transfer potential and on possibilities for industrial cooperation. While Boeing could not be specific on the cooperative activities it would pursue, it did provide a list of potential Brazilian partners and of possible projects in which they could participate. It also provided examples of how other F18 users contribute to the production of their aircraft. Most importantly, Boeing offers opening for broad cooperation with Embraer, not only on military, but on civilian aircraft as well. As Embraer specializes in regional jets that Boeing does not produce, such a partnership would allow both companies to utilize their respective strengths. As BRAF officials have indicated in the past that benefits to Embraer will be key, Boeing's offer should be attractive. (Note: Embraer is a private sector company, but the only Brazilian aircraft manufacturer and considered a national asset.) After an initial review of the Boeing submission, the BRAF team overseeing the process told the Boeing rep that the submission was "just what we were looking for."
¶3. (C) LOCKHEED. Lockheed Martin faces a more difficult road with its F16. In Brazil's aborted FX1 competition, the F16 was deemed not to meet Brazil's requirements, and many Brazilian Air Force officers believe it is too old an aircraft to compete with the other candidates. Lockheed is offering a newer, more capable F16, but the real appeal of the plane will be that it would establish a relationship with Lockheed that would carry over to eventual purchase of the F35 Joint Strike Fighter. Many Brazilian pilots have said openly that the F35 would be their preferred long term aircraft, but its availability would be after Brazil must replace its aging fleet. The F16 would provide a capable option until the F35 could be available. Lockheed's offer will also be attractive to Brazil because it would lead to construction of a manufacturing and/or assembly facility for the F16 in Brazil, delivering a direct economic benefit over the life of the aircraft in Brazilian service. The BRAF team called the Lockheed proposal "impressive," but noted that because it was a late addition to the competition, they are least familiar with the F16. This could prove a disadvantage among the top level staff who will make final decisions. On the other hand, Lockheed's offers of co-production were well-received as was the potential for Brazil to become a regional service hub for other South American countries operating smaller numbers of F16s.
¶4. (C) OTHER COMPETITORS. Post does not have the details of the proposals of the other competitors, the Russian SU35, the Swedish Gripen and the French Rafale. Brazilian contacts have indicated that the French and Russians have both been active in lobbying for their planes in advance of their formal submissions. BRAF sources have told embassy officers that they would not prefer the Russian plane as they believe it has reliability problems and because the Russians are perceived as suppliers of last resort. Lockheed reps have said that they expect a strong proposal from Saab, to include a substantial offset package, based on the Swedish company's past activity.
¶5. (C) COMMENT. The two U.S. proposals could both provide Brazil with capable aircraft and strong economic benefits. In effect, they offer Brazil a choice between the shorter term
advantages of indigenous production of an aircraft with a limited shelflife and a potential long term relationship that would go well beyond the FX2 program. As noted in reftel, how Brazil views the economic advantages will be key in its decision making. U.S. competitors will also have to overcome a presumption that U.S. technology transfer policies are too restrictive and have indicated that they will request USG assistance in this regard. Providing Defense Minister Jobim with familiarization flights on both aircraft during his recent visit to the U.S. and with briefings on tech transfers has been a step in the right direction. With a relatively short period in which to make submission, competitors have put together impressive proposals. It is likely that the BRAF has compressed the normal process for RFIs in order to have its "short list" of aircraft together before the Minister for Planning unrolls the new national defense strategy on September 7 out of concern that the planning document will limit its options in selecting new fighters.
SOBELNão vão disponibilizar o AIM-9X porque não somos confiáveis como Arábia Saudita e Coréia do Sul e também não vão nos passar os códigos de integração do nosso armamento, a razão da rusga da COPAC com a indústria e a malígna transferência de tecnologia:2008, Dec 12
The Fx2 Competition: Overcoming Key Challenges — Embassy Brasilia (Brazil)
Reference id: 08BRASILIA1589
Cable time: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:52 UTC
Origin: Embassy Brasilia
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Published on: 11 Jul 2011 (original), 1 Sep 2011 (diff) (now)
Highlight:
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRASILIA 001589 SIPDIS STATE FOR PM/RSAT AND WHA/BSC E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/11/2018 TAGS: PREL [External Political Relations], ETTC [Trade and Technology Controls], MASC, BR [Brazil] SUBJECT: THE FX2 COMPETITION: OVERCOMING KEY CHALLENGES REF: A. BRASILIA 1373 B. SECDEF REPORT ON JOBIM MEETING 12/10/08 C. IIR 6 809 0043 09 Classified By: DCM Lisa Kubiske. Reason: 1.5(d)
¶1. (C) SUMMARY. A December 9 meeting with Boeing representatives highlighted several key issues for the success of Boeing,s bid for Brazil,s next generation fighter aircraft, the FX2. As noted in ref a, technology transfer continues to be Brazil,s most important criterion for selecting a fighter. While there is some scope for interpretation of transfer of technology, several factors, namely weapons integration and source codes, will be seen as key to a successful bid, as will the potential for Brazilian manufacture of components. In a December 10 meeting, Brazilian Air Force finance officials informed Embassy reps about financing requirements and expressed concern that in the past USG inflexibility has got in the way of FMS financing. With French President Sarkozy visiting later in the month a major effort to establish the French aircraft as a presumptive choice is likely. While all these factors provide challenges for the success of Boeing,s bid, there are immediate steps that the USG can take to keep the Super Hornet in the lead. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (C) As Boeing completes its submission for the Brazilian Request for Proposal (RFP) for a next generation fighter, its representatives highlight several issues that will be critical to winning the competition. Ref a noted the importance of technology transfer for the Brazilians, and Embassy contacts continue to place a priority on this as a deciding factor. The Brazilians have generally avoided specific demands for technology but have made clear that they expect that technology transferred under the FX2 program should benefit their industry and that they expect technology equal to that of other major air forces. Defense Minister Jobim was recently quoted as saying that &national (industrial) capacity is fundamental to this sort of deal.8 He told Secretary Gates that Brazil had declined to choose the Lockheed Martin F16 as a FX2 finalist because it is seen as older technology (ref b). Boeing is expected to present a strong industrial cooperation package to include significant incentives for Brazilian industries, but when evaluating the candidates, the Brazilian Air Force will likely also consider the specific technologies on offer. For example, excluding the AIM 9x missile, which has been approved for export to such countries as South Korea, Switzerland and Saudi Arabia, would be seen as evidence of an unwillingness to transfer technology that we have offered to others and confirm Brazilian suspicions about U.S. trustworthiness as a supplier.
¶3. (C) Based on what Brazilian Air Force leaders have told the Embassy and Boeing, there are two aspects of tech transfer in particular that should be seen as redlines for Brazil: source codes and weapons integration. While the Brazilian Air Force understands that there are some source codes that no manufacturer will provide, its Commander, Brigadeiro Saito, has stated publicly that he expects source code to be provided. The key for Brazil will be to have such codes as are necessary to operate the aircraft and make use of technology derived for its domestic industries, but Saito will use openness to provide codes as a litmus test for the larger question of technology transfer. Brazil also will need to be able to say that it can use domestically-produced weapons on its new aircraft. Given the high importance the government places on supporting Brazilian defense industries, it would be unthinkable for a major purchase not to make use of local products.
¶4. (C) In a December 10 meeting with Embassy reps, Brazilian Air Force planning chief Brig.Alvaro Knupp dos Santos (3 star) discussed Brazilian concerns about financing its fighter
purchase. The original plan was to make an outright cash purchase to be financed by selling bonds. Current market rates, however, make this prohibitively expensive. Brazil will need seller financing and is asking all three candidates about possible arrangements. The Brazilian Air Force is particularly concerned that it will have to "defend" its deal to the Ministry of Finance and answer detailed questions about why proposed finance arrangements would be in Brazil,s best interests. Knupp further commented that financing as part of U.S. Foreign Military Sales (FMS) procurements has been a problem in the past because of "lack of flexibility" on the U.S. side and "demanding lawyers" on the Brazilian. He requested a copy of the standard provisions for FMS cases as soon as possible so as to identify and address any possible obstacles. Knupp was clear that he does not want finance arrangements to get in the way of a possible sale and indicated a strong willingness to engage with the USG and Boeing so as to avoid potential pitfalls.
¶5. (SBU) French President Sarkozy is expected to visit Brazil during the week of December 22. While in country, he is expected to sign an agreement on the purchase of diesel electric submarines and a defense cooperation agreement. With Brazil,s new defense strategy paper due out at about the same time, there should be considerable public momentum given to the &Strategic Partnership8 between the two countries. While Brazilian Air Force leaders have told Embassy reps that there will be no movement on the fighter purchase, the French will seek to reinforce perceptions that the Rafale is the leader in the competition and its selection is a virtual fait accompli. Boeing is conscious of the public relations impetus that the French will gain from the visit and is looking for an opportunity to generate some press coverage for the Super Hornet by sponsoring a visit by Brazilian journalists to Boeing,s U.S. facilities and providing them access to pilots who have flown the plane in combat.
¶6. (C) COMMENT: During the December 10 meeting, it became clear that among Air Force personnel, the Super Hornet is the current competition leader. The F18,s superior capabilities, technology and overall cost give it an advantage. However, these factors will not, in the final consideration, outweigh possible perceptions that other planes could offer better technology transfer and financing. Decisions on technology release should set appropriate limits on what technology will be made available, but the key to a successful outcome will be to ensure that such decisions are briefed to the Brazilians in terms of what they will be receiving rather than in terms of what we are withholding. It will be important to be able to reassure the Brazilians that they are being treated consistently with other friendly countries in terms of technology release and that the technologies on offer will benefit Brazilian industry. For the two key issues of weapons integration and source codes, the answer to the Brazilians should be "yes, but...," Brazil will get the necessary codes for the industrial cooperation envisioned in the offset package even if some source code will not be transferred. Similarly, Brazil needs to hear that it would be able to use its weaponry, even if it may not immediately choose to undertake the expense of proceeding with integration. We should also engage with the Brazilians as early as possible on the issue of FMS sales and how to avoid potential legal roadblocks in a financing package. It will also be important to complete information sharing arrangements for the FX2 program as early as possible and continue to press the Brazilians for a more comprehensive agreement.
¶7. (C) COMMENT CONTINUED: Following upcoming Washington discussions on technology transfer and financing, which should provide a clearer picture of the possible technology transfer package, post will seek to review with Washington agencies the potential transfers against our understanding of Brazilian requirements and the precedents set by technology release decisions to other non-NATO countries. Given the SecDef,s assurance to MOD Jobim in ref b that the U.S. tech transfer package would be strong, the final interagency recommendation should reflect this view. We should then expedite contact with Boeing to ensure that the RFP submission takes into account the USG position. As there will have to be restrictions on the technology to be released, it will remain critically important for post to be engaged in the process to craft an approach that explains why the technology package is attractive for Brazil and gives supporters of the F18 in the Air Force the arguments they need to make the Super Hornet Brazil's choice.
SOBELProblemas de financiamento com dicas da SEFA pro SH não ser desclassificado:2009, Feb 20
Brazil Fx2 Competition: The Bids Are In; Next Steps — Embassy Brasilia (Brazil)
Reference id: 09BRASILIA216
Cable time: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:27 UTC
Origin: Embassy Brasilia
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Published on: 11 Jul 2011 (original), 1 Sep 2011 (diff) (now)
Highlight:
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 000216 SIPDIS STATE FOR WHA/BSC, PM/RSAT E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/14/2019 TAGS: BR [Brazil], PREL [External Political Relations], MARR [Military and Defense Arrangements], ETTC [Trade and Technology Controls] SUBJECT: BRAZIL FX2 COMPETITION: THE BIDS ARE IN; NEXT
STEPS REF: A. BRASILIA 41 B. 08 BRASILIA 1373 Classified By: Ambassador Clifford Sobel. Reason 1.5 (D)
¶1. (C) SUMMARY. Following the February 2 submission of bids for Brazil's FX2 fighter competition, the Brazilian Air Force (BRAF) will begin the process of technical evaluation. The U.S. competitor, Boeing's F18 Super Hornet, submitted a proposal that complied with Brazilian technical requirements and offered an extensive package of offsets that evoked an positive initial reaction from the BRAF. Despite this, the Super Hornet is still perceived as trailing the French competitor as Brazilian affinity for its "strategic partnership" with France has led to Dassault's Rafale being perceived as the default choice. To overcome such perceptions, Boeing hosted a group of prominent Brazilian journalists on a tour of U.S. Navy and Boeing facilities that should result in more balanced reporting in the Brazilian press. For a successful outcome to the FX2 process, the USG will need to be prepared to answer Brazilian questions about technology release, particularly regarding source codes and integration of third party weapons outside the U.S., in a way that does not give an outright "no" to the Brazilians while remaining consistent with USG policy. See paragraphs 4-8 for specific suggestions on next steps. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (C) On February 2, responses to the Request for Proposal (RFP) for Brazil's next generation fighter aircraft (FX2) were submitted to the BRAF in Sao Jose dos Campos by Boeing, Dassault and Saab. With the RFP issued as recently as November, the rapid response from the USG, particularly with regard to technology release, was a significant achievement. Thus far in the FX2 process, most BRAF reps have told embassy officials that they might prefer the F18 as the superior aircraft but were not confident about the releasability of U.S. technology. USMLO Brasilia reports many congratulations from the BRAF on the completeness of Boeing's bid, although there has already been one follow up request for confirmation that all technologies included in the package have been approved for export. Despite the success of the RFP response, there remains a perception among Brazilian leaders that the French candidate, the Rafale, remains the plane to beat in the competition. President Sarkozy's highly-publicized visit to Rio in December and his strong personal friendship with President Lula are seen as giving the Frencha strong political preference.
¶3. (U) As a step toward building the public case for the F18, Boeing sponsored a February 2-5 tour for Brazilian journalists to Washington, NAS Oceana and St. Louis. Participants heard from WHA A/S Shannon and PM AA/S Ruggeiro that the USG strongly supports the sale, including through the transfer of technology and understands Brazil's importance for the stability of the Western Hemisphere. The journalists' questions seemed to accept that the USG was prepared to approve the transfer of relevant technologies and focused on wheather this represented a change in policy to now provide Brazil with the best equipment available. There was also considerable interest in the overall cost of the aircraft and the possibility of financing. By visiting Navy units operating the Super Hornet, the journalists heard first hand accounts of the plane's superior performance from those who have flown it in combat and observed flight operations. The Navy presentations drove home the point that with the F18 Brazil will get a plane with proven performance and reliability, something neither of the other competitors can
offer. In St. Louis, the group was briefed on Boeing's manufacturing operations and the potential advantages to Brazilian industry of partnership with Boeing.
NEXT STEPS ----------
¶4. (C) While the presentation of a strong RFP was an important step, there are still several potential pitfalls in the evaluation process and opportunities to build support for the U.S. candidate. As noted in ref B and previous reporting, Brazilian concerns that the U.S. could withhold key technologies remain a significant factor against success in the FX2 competition. The RFP response, along with BRASILIA 00000216 002 OF 002 positive press coverage, has alleviated much of this concern, but there are several points remaining which, if incorrectly presented, could revive accusations that the U.S. will not transfer technology. The RFP response to the BRAF requirement for a within visual range (WVR) weapon proposed either the U.S.-made AIM9M or integration of a third party weapon, presumably Brazilian-made. While either option will meet the RFP conditions, the Brazilians may notice that a more advanced U.S.-made missile, the AIM 9X, has been approved for export to such Air Forces as those of Saudi Arabia and South Korea and assume that Brazil is less trusted. Post understands that approval of the AIM9X for Brazil remains unlikely, but it will be important not to respond to Brazilian inquiries about this weapon with an outright "no." We should be prepared to explain that we understand that Brazil's policy is to favor indigenous weapons, as articulated in the recent defense strategy, and we are prepared to work with Brazil to integrate such missiles as they become available. We are also offering a lower cost, high performance alternative in the AIM9M. If Brazilian industry is interested, we could suggest partnership with U.S. firms on an improved WVR weapon.
¶5. (C) Similarly, we may see some Brazilian pushback on the location for weapons integration. Ideally, the Brazilians will want this done in Brazil with Brazilian engineers, an arrangment we understand that the USG will not approve. Again, rather than simply denying such a request, it would be better that the USG response focus on the downsides of doing the work in Brazil: huge increases in cost and the disadvantage of exempting Brazilian Super Hornets from ongoing technological improvements occurring in the worldwide Hornet/Super Hornet communities. In order to take full advantage of the mature technologies Boeing is offering (as opposed to its competitors, many of whose key systems are still on the drawing board), Brazil will have to participate in the Super Hornet program as a regular partner, and that means with key weapons integration done in the U.S.
¶6. (C) Before any aircraft could be transferred to Brazil, we will need to complete an information sharing agreement that will ensure protection of classified data. While this is in process, the process of approving technology release for the RFP response revealed that the BRAF will also need to complete an arrangement for protection of the GPS signals used for
weapons guidance. Prompt progress on these arrangements will be instrumental to completing a sale.
¶7. (SBU) The journalists participating in the tour gave strongly positive feedback to Boeing and Embassy reps. We have heard from several that stories will soon be appearing in major Brazilian publications (to be reported septel). As a follow on, embassy is discussing with Boeing the possibility of organizing a similar tour for Brazilian political/opinion leaders that would focus on the importance of the U.S.-Brazil relationship and the benefits, both political and economic to enhancing our partnership. Participation could be open to members of the Brazilian Congress that will have to approve funding for the FX2 and former Ministers who now can influence Brazilian opinion.
¶8. (SBU) President Lula's March visit to Washington will provide an opportunity to signal USG support for the sale of the Super Hornet and highlight the advantages to Brazil of buying the planes. Ideally, President Lula would be offered the same sort of familiarization flight in a Super Hornet that was conducted for Defense Minister Jobim in July 2008. Given the high degree of Brazilian interest in the new U.S. administration, we expect plentiful opportunities for high level contacts in the coming months. These should be used to remind Brazilian leaders of strong USG support for Boeing and the superiority of the F18 offer.
SOBEL2009, May 22
Financing For Brazil's Fighter Purchase — Embassy Brasilia (Brazil)
Reference id: 09BRASILIA659
Cable time: Fri, 22 May 2009 20:57 UTC
Origin: Embassy Brasilia
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Published on: 11 Jul 2011 (original), 1 Sep 2011 (diff) (now)
Highlight:
UNCLAS BRASILIA 000659 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: MASS [Military Assistance and Sales], PREL [External Political Relations], BR [Brazil] SUBJECT: FINANCING FOR BRAZIL'S FIGHTER PURCHASE REF: Brasilia 634
¶1. (SBU) The Brazilian Air Force (BRAF) Finance Secretariat (SEFA) has been tasked to submit a report on financing arrangements being presented by the Governments of each of the three competitors (US, France, and Sweden) to support proposals for Brazil's next generation fighter (FX2). The finance report will be submitted together with the BRAF technical recommendation to the National Defense Committee (NDC), consisting of the President of the Republic, the Presidents of the Legislative Houses and the Ministers of Justice, Defense, Foreign Affairs, Treasury, Planning and the Military High Commanders, to assist in their final decision. According to BRAF sources, if two competitors are close in the technical ranking, a decision to seek international financing could lead to SEFA's report being a decisive factor. During a Brazilian Air Force Finance Secretariat Visit to Washington DC on 29 and 30 Apr 2009 SEFA requested Governments communicate in writing detailed financing support of the F-X2 project by 29 May 2009. SEFA Director Maj. Brig. Knupp told Commerce and DSCA reps "SEFA expects 100% financing for F-X2 under Export Credit Agency (ECA) conditions." SEFA delivered the same message to the other competitors during visits to France and Sweden.
¶2. (SBU) The USG is at a competitive disadvantage as Ex-Im Bank, the US ECA, is prohibited by law from financing defense articles. ECAs in France and Sweden have no similar restrictions and will provide ECA guarantees to support their offers as requested by SEFA. Exceptions to EXIM regulations can only be made via legislative action.
¶3. (SBU) Crafting the USG response to SEFA's request is challenging given that we have no possibility of ECA support available. Post therefore recommends the USG communicate a willingness to approach Congress for legislation supporting the Super Hornet. Precedents for exceptions to EXIM rules include legislation to support the sale of F-16s to Poland, and to approve EXIM financing of military helicopters for Greece and, in a separate case, Turkey. Maj Brig Knupp (3-star) told MLO and FCS reps that he understands our legal challenges, and said that even if non-committal, the expression of willingness to approach Congress would be a significant demonstration of interest by the USG in support of Brazil and the Super Hornet offer. In order to remain viable in the FX2 competition, it is essential that a USG response to SEFA's request is submitted by the May 29 deadline. While the finance arrangements by themselves may not be decisive, lack of viable financing could well erode what post believes will be a significant advantage for Boeing from the Super Hornet's overall affordability.
KUBISKE