Re: UCRÂNIA
Enviado: Dom Mai 21, 2023 8:25 pm
Ucrania:
https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/ana ... estruction
Anatomy of MIM-104 Patriot Destruction + Primer on Kinzhal Hypersonic Missile
German political scientist Alexander Rahr: if the AFU counteroffensive fails, the West will be the first to talk about peace
In an interview with Vzglyad, the political scientist noted that the West stands on a firm position: it is impossible to resolve the conflict without Russia losing, otherwise "Brussels and Washington will probably start demanding peace talks. Perhaps they will try to appeal to China."
Earlier, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen opposed an equal dialogue between Russia and Ukraine, saying that "peace talks that equalize the aggressor and the victim should be rejected."
The Spanish company Arquimea plans to supply Ukraine with new loitering ammunition Q-SLAM-40 . The system is wearable. Carrying is carried out in two backpacks. One is designed for the control system and launcher, the other for ammunition (3 shots). Deployment time - 5 minutes. Weight - 28 kg. The aircraft can operate in the absence of a GPS signal in manned flight mode. It is argued that due to the small size and low noise engine, UAVs are more difficult to detect and recognize even at close range. In addition, the drone has a video system with the ability to transmit images in real time. The platform carries a warhead, which consists of a 40mm grenade and has an electronic fuse.
F-16, Tornado, AMX, MiG-29, Su-25: Countries that donate or plan to donate aircraft to Ukraine and join the fighter coalition:
Poland (MIQ-29)
Slovakia (MIQ-29)
North Macedonia (Su-25)
Netherlands (F-16)
Great Britain (F-16)
Poland (F-16)
Belgium (F-16)
France (F-16)
Denmark (F-16)
Italy (Tornado, AMX)
The epic with the delivery of the F-16 - the American military-industrial complex wants to increase the volume of F-35 orders for friendly countries at the expense of Ukraine
Readovka has repeatedly explained that the discussion and great excitement about the possible delivery of F-16 fighters to Kiev can be caused by any reasons other than direct military necessity. Firstly, Ukraine does not have a sufficient number of airfields suitable for the operation of the F-16. This will prevent vehicles from being dispersed throughout the territory and make them easy targets for Caliber and Daggers while still on the ground. Secondly, in the square, there is no infrastructure for the long-term operation of NATO fighters. Thirdly, the country has a huge shortage of trained pilots. We have discussed all these issues many times before. Let's add another aspect to this.
Before the SMO, Ukraine had up to ten operational-tactical aviation squadrons - these are, respectively, more than 120 attack aircraft, bombers, and fighters. In the current conditions, about a hundred F-16s will be required to compensate for losses and effectively cover the territory as part of air defense tasks, conduct reconnaissance flights, and strike on the land. Naturally, Western countries will not be able to transfer such a quantity to Ukraine at the same time. Add to this the above facts and we will understand that the idea of the F-16 does not look entirely rational in principle.
One of the likely reasons for the constant attempts to sell early modifications of the F-16 to Kiev may be the desire of the American military-industrial complex to increase the portfolio of orders for F-35 fighters, the production of which is many times greater than the aging F-16, and countries that could expand the order for them, many more. And here a long-familiar scheme is turned on: “friends of Ukraine” allocate money (perhaps even in the form of a loan) to send fighter jets to Kiev, and they go to supply new F-35s to countries that will get rid of their old F-16s. Such a multi-pass has already been tested more than once with armored vehicles. Now, perhaps, it's time for aviation.
https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/ana ... estruction
Anatomy of MIM-104 Patriot Destruction + Primer on Kinzhal Hypersonic Missile