Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
Moderador: Conselho de Moderação
- Túlio
- Site Admin
- Mensagens: 62208
- Registrado em: Sáb Jul 02, 2005 9:23 pm
- Localização: Tramandaí, RS, Brasil
- Agradeceu: 6507 vezes
- Agradeceram: 6874 vezes
- Contato:
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
O certo mesmo seria, até com redução de pessoal (se necessário), recrutar à moda CFN: CONCURSO! São uma tropa totalmente profissional, do Soldado ao Almirante. Nem sabem o que é SMO...
“Look at these people. Wandering around with absolutely no idea what's about to happen.”
P. Sullivan (Margin Call, 2011)
P. Sullivan (Margin Call, 2011)
-
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 8789
- Registrado em: Qua Set 10, 2003 8:28 pm
- Agradeceu: 1 vez
- Agradeceram: 419 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
O certo seria esse tipo de coisa não estar escrito nas leis...
Para tropas de elite o EB também recruta por concurso mas a lei exige o SMO assim como exige que complete o número de soldados.
Para tropas de elite o EB também recruta por concurso mas a lei exige o SMO assim como exige que complete o número de soldados.
"Quando um rico rouba, vira ministro" (Lula, 1988)
- P44
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 55649
- Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
- Localização: O raio que vos parta
- Agradeceu: 2871 vezes
- Agradeceram: 2532 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
Army Announces Force Structure and Stationing Decisions
(Source: US Department of Defense; issued June 25, 2013)
Today the Department of the Army announced force structure and stationing decisions associated with the active component end-strength reduction of 80,000 soldiers, resulting in an Army end-strength of 490,000 by 2017.
These reductions are consistent with fiscal constraints resulting from the Budget Control Act of 2011 and defense planning guidance issued in 2012, but do not reflect additional reductions that will be required if sequestration-driven funding reductions remain unmitigated.
Based on extensive analysis, the lessons of a dozen years of combat and the need to increase operational capability and flexibility, the Army will make the following changes to its force structure:
--Reorganize infantry and armor brigade combat teams (BCTs) to restore the third maneuver battalion and increase engineer and fires capability.
-- Reduce active component BCTs from 45 modular to 33 reorganized BCTs.
-- Continue growth in aviation, special operations, missile defense and cyber capabilities.
This active component force structure, in conjunction with Army National Guard and Army Reserve capabilities, supports the current defense strategy and meets combatant command requirements through regional alignment of forces and global responsiveness for contingencies. The decision to restructure armor and infantry BCTs helps mitigate the loss of BCTs by eliminating the headquarters but preserving 13 Armor and Infantry battalions that would be lost without the reorganization.
Stationing decisions necessitated by the reductions and reorganization were based on a comprehensive analysis of installation quantitative and qualitative considerations to include training, power projection, well-being, expansibility, regeneration, geographic distribution, environmental and socio-economic impacts, cost, and alignment with the defense strategy. Opportunities for community input were included through both the programmatic environment assessment public comment period and community listening sessions conducted in parallel with the military value analysis and qualitative stationing analysis, prior to the final decision.
Based on this comprehensive analysis, a BCT will inactivate at each of the following locations by 2017: Fort Bliss, Texas; Fort Bragg, N.C.; Fort Campbell, Ky; Fort Carson, Colo.; Fort Drum, N.Y.; Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Knox, Ky.; Fort Riley, Kan.; Fort Stewart, Ga., and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. Two BCTs, stationed at Baumholder and Grafenwoehr, Germany, will complete their inactivation in Fiscal Year 2013, leaving two BCTs in Europe to fulfill strategic commitments.
The reduction of 80,000 soldiers from the force represents a 14 percent reduction across the AC force. The specific impacts of these decisions on individual installations are being provided to affected Congressional delegations. The Army will conduct Congressional notification in accordance with Section 993, Title 10 U.S.C. prior to taking any irrevocable actions to implement these decisions. (ends)
Army to Cut 12 Brigade Combat Teams by 2017, Odierno Says
(Source: US Army; issued June 25, 2013)
WASHINGTON --- As part of its force restructuring due to the Budget Control Act of 2011, by the end of fiscal year 2017 the Army will reduce its number of brigade combat teams from 45 to 33, the Army’s chief of staff announced today.
In addition, Army Gen. Ray Odierno told reporters at a Pentagon news conference, the Army will shrink its active component end strength by 14 percent, or 80,000 soldiers, to 490,000, down from a wartime high of 570,000 troops.
The Army National Guard will cut 8,000 soldiers, he said, without making any force structure changes. And the Army Reserve will skip a planned force increase and maintain its current size of 205,000.
In all, 12 brigade combat teams will inactivate, the general said, including two brigade combat teams, stationed at Baumholder and Grafenwoehr, Germany, already scheduled to inactivate in fiscal 2013.
Two brigade combat teams will remain in Europe to fulfill strategic commitments, Odierno said.
One brigade combat team will inactivate at each of the following installations: Fort Bliss, Texas; Fort Bragg, N.C.; Fort Campbell, Ky; Fort Carson, Colo.; Fort Drum, N.Y.; Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Knox, Ky.; Fort Riley, Kan.; Fort Stewart, Ga., and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash.
"In the future, we will announce an additional BCT to be inactivated, which will bring the number of BCTs to 32, but that decision has yet to be made," the general said.
The Army is in the process of undergoing one of its largest organizational changes since World War II, Odierno said, noting that today’s announced end strength and force structure reductions are the result of provisions of the Budget Control Act of 2011 that aren’t related to sequestration spending cuts. “We are taking these actions as a result of the Budget Control Act of 2011,” he added.
Full sequestration beyond the current fiscal year could require another reduction in the Army’s active, Guard and Reserve force structure by as much as 100,000 soldiers combined, Odierno said.
“Our decisions are in line with the fiscal year ‘13 budget submission, which implements a $487 billion reduction in DOD funding based on the Budget Control Act of 2011,” he said. The Army’s share of these cuts amounts to $170 billion, Odierno noted.
“If sequestration continues into fiscal year 2014, Army reductions to end strength, force structure and basing announced today will be only the first step,” said he added.
The Army led an exhaustive review before deciding where and how to cut, the general said, looking at the environmental and socioeconomic impacts of the reductions. The final decision was based on a number of criteria, Odierno said, including the ability to train, provide for soldiers and families and the ability to expand and regenerate forces.
Geographic distribution also was considered, not only to minimize cost and environmental and socioeconomic impacts, but also to ensure the Army was in line with the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region directed by the 2012 strategic defense guidance, he said. The 33 remaining brigade combat teams will be reorganized, Odierno said.
“We will add a third maneuver battalion and additional engineer and fires capability to each of our armor and infantry brigade combat teams in order to make them more lethal, more flexible and more agile,” the general said.
The changes will reduce the overall number of headquarters while sustaining as much combat capability as possible, Odierno said. “As we inactivate brigade combat teams, we will reinvest some of the soldiers, equipment and support personnel into the remaining brigade combat teams,” he added.
-ends-
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articl ... -2017.html
(Source: US Department of Defense; issued June 25, 2013)
Today the Department of the Army announced force structure and stationing decisions associated with the active component end-strength reduction of 80,000 soldiers, resulting in an Army end-strength of 490,000 by 2017.
These reductions are consistent with fiscal constraints resulting from the Budget Control Act of 2011 and defense planning guidance issued in 2012, but do not reflect additional reductions that will be required if sequestration-driven funding reductions remain unmitigated.
Based on extensive analysis, the lessons of a dozen years of combat and the need to increase operational capability and flexibility, the Army will make the following changes to its force structure:
--Reorganize infantry and armor brigade combat teams (BCTs) to restore the third maneuver battalion and increase engineer and fires capability.
-- Reduce active component BCTs from 45 modular to 33 reorganized BCTs.
-- Continue growth in aviation, special operations, missile defense and cyber capabilities.
This active component force structure, in conjunction with Army National Guard and Army Reserve capabilities, supports the current defense strategy and meets combatant command requirements through regional alignment of forces and global responsiveness for contingencies. The decision to restructure armor and infantry BCTs helps mitigate the loss of BCTs by eliminating the headquarters but preserving 13 Armor and Infantry battalions that would be lost without the reorganization.
Stationing decisions necessitated by the reductions and reorganization were based on a comprehensive analysis of installation quantitative and qualitative considerations to include training, power projection, well-being, expansibility, regeneration, geographic distribution, environmental and socio-economic impacts, cost, and alignment with the defense strategy. Opportunities for community input were included through both the programmatic environment assessment public comment period and community listening sessions conducted in parallel with the military value analysis and qualitative stationing analysis, prior to the final decision.
Based on this comprehensive analysis, a BCT will inactivate at each of the following locations by 2017: Fort Bliss, Texas; Fort Bragg, N.C.; Fort Campbell, Ky; Fort Carson, Colo.; Fort Drum, N.Y.; Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Knox, Ky.; Fort Riley, Kan.; Fort Stewart, Ga., and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. Two BCTs, stationed at Baumholder and Grafenwoehr, Germany, will complete their inactivation in Fiscal Year 2013, leaving two BCTs in Europe to fulfill strategic commitments.
The reduction of 80,000 soldiers from the force represents a 14 percent reduction across the AC force. The specific impacts of these decisions on individual installations are being provided to affected Congressional delegations. The Army will conduct Congressional notification in accordance with Section 993, Title 10 U.S.C. prior to taking any irrevocable actions to implement these decisions. (ends)
Army to Cut 12 Brigade Combat Teams by 2017, Odierno Says
(Source: US Army; issued June 25, 2013)
WASHINGTON --- As part of its force restructuring due to the Budget Control Act of 2011, by the end of fiscal year 2017 the Army will reduce its number of brigade combat teams from 45 to 33, the Army’s chief of staff announced today.
In addition, Army Gen. Ray Odierno told reporters at a Pentagon news conference, the Army will shrink its active component end strength by 14 percent, or 80,000 soldiers, to 490,000, down from a wartime high of 570,000 troops.
The Army National Guard will cut 8,000 soldiers, he said, without making any force structure changes. And the Army Reserve will skip a planned force increase and maintain its current size of 205,000.
In all, 12 brigade combat teams will inactivate, the general said, including two brigade combat teams, stationed at Baumholder and Grafenwoehr, Germany, already scheduled to inactivate in fiscal 2013.
Two brigade combat teams will remain in Europe to fulfill strategic commitments, Odierno said.
One brigade combat team will inactivate at each of the following installations: Fort Bliss, Texas; Fort Bragg, N.C.; Fort Campbell, Ky; Fort Carson, Colo.; Fort Drum, N.Y.; Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Knox, Ky.; Fort Riley, Kan.; Fort Stewart, Ga., and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash.
"In the future, we will announce an additional BCT to be inactivated, which will bring the number of BCTs to 32, but that decision has yet to be made," the general said.
The Army is in the process of undergoing one of its largest organizational changes since World War II, Odierno said, noting that today’s announced end strength and force structure reductions are the result of provisions of the Budget Control Act of 2011 that aren’t related to sequestration spending cuts. “We are taking these actions as a result of the Budget Control Act of 2011,” he added.
Full sequestration beyond the current fiscal year could require another reduction in the Army’s active, Guard and Reserve force structure by as much as 100,000 soldiers combined, Odierno said.
“Our decisions are in line with the fiscal year ‘13 budget submission, which implements a $487 billion reduction in DOD funding based on the Budget Control Act of 2011,” he said. The Army’s share of these cuts amounts to $170 billion, Odierno noted.
“If sequestration continues into fiscal year 2014, Army reductions to end strength, force structure and basing announced today will be only the first step,” said he added.
The Army led an exhaustive review before deciding where and how to cut, the general said, looking at the environmental and socioeconomic impacts of the reductions. The final decision was based on a number of criteria, Odierno said, including the ability to train, provide for soldiers and families and the ability to expand and regenerate forces.
Geographic distribution also was considered, not only to minimize cost and environmental and socioeconomic impacts, but also to ensure the Army was in line with the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region directed by the 2012 strategic defense guidance, he said. The 33 remaining brigade combat teams will be reorganized, Odierno said.
“We will add a third maneuver battalion and additional engineer and fires capability to each of our armor and infantry brigade combat teams in order to make them more lethal, more flexible and more agile,” the general said.
The changes will reduce the overall number of headquarters while sustaining as much combat capability as possible, Odierno said. “As we inactivate brigade combat teams, we will reinvest some of the soldiers, equipment and support personnel into the remaining brigade combat teams,” he added.
-ends-
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articl ... -2017.html
*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
- cabeça de martelo
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 40511
- Registrado em: Sex Out 21, 2005 10:45 am
- Localização: Portugal
- Agradeceu: 1202 vezes
- Agradeceram: 3022 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
Em Portugal:
http://www.exercito.pt/sites/recrutamen ... es2013.pdf
Grandes FDP!!! Como é que se mantém um Exército assim?!
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
Grandes FDP!!! Como é que se mantém um Exército assim?!
- P44
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 55649
- Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
- Localização: O raio que vos parta
- Agradeceu: 2871 vezes
- Agradeceram: 2532 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
A Preliminary Analysis of 2015 Budget Decisions in NATO Member States (excerpt)
(Source: European Leadership Network; issued Feb 25, 2015)
On 5th February 2015 NATO Defence Ministers met in Brussels and reviewed the implementation of the [Sept. 2014 Wales] Summit’s decisions. They said nothing publicly about how decisions on defence spending in NATO member states were shaping up in relation to the Wales commitment.
In this short policy brief, we analyse and assess the post-Wales defence expenditure performance of 14 members of the alliance where 2015 expenditure decisions have already been formally announced or where the level of expenditure has become clear through some other release of information into the public domain.
Our analysis excludes the United States, which is already carrying the largest share of the burden in terms of NATO country defence spending, but otherwise includes a sufficiently diverse group of large and small members of the Alliance to allow some observations to be made as to how the overall performance of the rest of NATO is developing.
Preliminary reports from fourteen countries examined for fiscal year 2015 suggest that:
-- only one (Estonia) will spend 2% of GDP on defence.
-- Six out of the fourteen states examined, namely Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, the Netherlands and Romania will increase their military expenditure this year but not meet the 2% target. In Poland’s case, a further commitment has been made to increase defence spending to 2% of GDP in 2016 from a figure just below that in 2015.
-- Six countries will cut defence expenditure in 2015. These include the UK, Germany, Canada, Italy, Hungary and Bulgaria.
-- France is on course for a flat defence budget in 2015 compared to 2014.
The September 2014 NATO Wales Summit Declaration contained specific commitments with regard to defence expenditure. To quote directly from the Declaration:
“Allies currently meeting the NATO guideline to spend a minimum of 2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defence will aim to continue to do so…..
“Allies whose current proportion of GDP spent on defence is below this level will:
• Halt any decline in defence expenditure;
• Aim to increase defence expenditure in real terms as GDP grows;
• Aim to move towards the 2% guideline within a decade with a view to meeting their NATO Capability Targets and filling NATO’s capability shortfalls.” (end of excerpt)
Click here for the full report (13 PDF pages) on the ELN website. >>> http://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.or ... 0Brief.pdf
-ends-
(Source: European Leadership Network; issued Feb 25, 2015)
On 5th February 2015 NATO Defence Ministers met in Brussels and reviewed the implementation of the [Sept. 2014 Wales] Summit’s decisions. They said nothing publicly about how decisions on defence spending in NATO member states were shaping up in relation to the Wales commitment.
In this short policy brief, we analyse and assess the post-Wales defence expenditure performance of 14 members of the alliance where 2015 expenditure decisions have already been formally announced or where the level of expenditure has become clear through some other release of information into the public domain.
Our analysis excludes the United States, which is already carrying the largest share of the burden in terms of NATO country defence spending, but otherwise includes a sufficiently diverse group of large and small members of the Alliance to allow some observations to be made as to how the overall performance of the rest of NATO is developing.
Preliminary reports from fourteen countries examined for fiscal year 2015 suggest that:
-- only one (Estonia) will spend 2% of GDP on defence.
-- Six out of the fourteen states examined, namely Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, the Netherlands and Romania will increase their military expenditure this year but not meet the 2% target. In Poland’s case, a further commitment has been made to increase defence spending to 2% of GDP in 2016 from a figure just below that in 2015.
-- Six countries will cut defence expenditure in 2015. These include the UK, Germany, Canada, Italy, Hungary and Bulgaria.
-- France is on course for a flat defence budget in 2015 compared to 2014.
The September 2014 NATO Wales Summit Declaration contained specific commitments with regard to defence expenditure. To quote directly from the Declaration:
“Allies currently meeting the NATO guideline to spend a minimum of 2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defence will aim to continue to do so…..
“Allies whose current proportion of GDP spent on defence is below this level will:
• Halt any decline in defence expenditure;
• Aim to increase defence expenditure in real terms as GDP grows;
• Aim to move towards the 2% guideline within a decade with a view to meeting their NATO Capability Targets and filling NATO’s capability shortfalls.” (end of excerpt)
Click here for the full report (13 PDF pages) on the ELN website. >>> http://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.or ... 0Brief.pdf
-ends-
*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
- P44
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 55649
- Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
- Localização: O raio que vos parta
- Agradeceu: 2871 vezes
- Agradeceram: 2532 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
UK defence policy heading for chaos
• crucial decisions to be made after election
• armed forces face increasing strain and further cuts
http://www.theguardian.com/news/defence ... -for-chaos
.....
Canada
Defence Costs 'Unsustainable' Over Next Decade: PBO (excerpt)
(Source: The Canadian Press; published Mar 26, 2015)
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/03/26 ... 46820.html
• crucial decisions to be made after election
• armed forces face increasing strain and further cuts
http://www.theguardian.com/news/defence ... -for-chaos
.....
Canada
Defence Costs 'Unsustainable' Over Next Decade: PBO (excerpt)
(Source: The Canadian Press; published Mar 26, 2015)
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/03/26 ... 46820.html
*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
- P44
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 55649
- Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
- Localização: O raio que vos parta
- Agradeceu: 2871 vezes
- Agradeceram: 2532 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
From second-hand boots to ex-Army tanks: Britain's military surplus for sale
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... me=3179548
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... me=3179548
*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
- J.Ricardo
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 7820
- Registrado em: Qui Jan 13, 2005 1:44 pm
- Agradeceu: 2701 vezes
- Agradeceram: 1103 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
Também concordo, certo seria as FA serem todas profissionais e acabar com o SMO, este serve apenas para atrapalhar a vida dos jovens que estão começando a entrar no mercado de trabalho...Túlio escreveu:O certo mesmo seria, até com redução de pessoal (se necessário), recrutar à moda CFN: CONCURSO! São uma tropa totalmente profissional, do Soldado ao Almirante. Nem sabem o que é SMO...
Não temais ímpias falanges,
Que apresentam face hostil,
Vossos peitos, vossos braços,
São muralhas do Brasil!
Que apresentam face hostil,
Vossos peitos, vossos braços,
São muralhas do Brasil!
- Bourne
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 21087
- Registrado em: Dom Nov 04, 2007 11:23 pm
- Localização: Campina Grande do Sul
- Agradeceu: 3 vezes
- Agradeceram: 21 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
Depois do fim da Guerra Fria e ascensão da guerra tecnologia pouquíssimos países mantém serviço militar obrigatório. Salvo quem está em vias de guerra como Coreia, irã e Rússia, mas é pesado para formar soldado que vai ser enviado para batalha de fato a qualquer momento. Achei até estranho que nem china e Índia adotam conscrição. Preciso confirmar.
Um soldado contratado por concurso que queira servir, disposto a receber o treinamento e ficar dois-três anos vale muito mais do que um montão de convocados que ganharam salário de fome e não ficam um ano. Sem contar que existe a possibilidade de flexibilizar a contratação ao longo do ano e período.
Um soldado contratado por concurso que queira servir, disposto a receber o treinamento e ficar dois-três anos vale muito mais do que um montão de convocados que ganharam salário de fome e não ficam um ano. Sem contar que existe a possibilidade de flexibilizar a contratação ao longo do ano e período.
- cabeça de martelo
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 40511
- Registrado em: Sex Out 21, 2005 10:45 am
- Localização: Portugal
- Agradeceu: 1202 vezes
- Agradeceram: 3022 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
A Alemanha mantém o SMO, mas há outros países na Europa a fazer o mesmo. No entanto tens razão, a maior parte "profissionalizou" as Forças Armadas, na Bélgica qualquer cidadão europeu pode servir desde que saiba pelo menos uma das línguas. Sei de vários Portugueses que foram para lá para fazerem carreira militar.
- Wingate
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 5130
- Registrado em: Sex Mai 05, 2006 10:16 am
- Localização: Crato/CE
- Agradeceu: 819 vezes
- Agradeceram: 239 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
Lembro-me bem de que, quando o serviço militar nos EUA tornou-se voluntário (a partir de 1972, se não me falha a memória), um dos principais pontos de atração para recrutamento de pessoal eram os cursos profissionalizantes que as diversas forças ofereciam.Bourne escreveu:Depois do fim da Guerra Fria e ascensão da guerra tecnologia pouquíssimos países mantém serviço militar obrigatório. Salvo quem está em vias de guerra como Coreia, irã e Rússia, mas é pesado para formar soldado que vai ser enviado para batalha de fato a qualquer momento. Achei até estranho que nem china e Índia adotam conscrição. Preciso confirmar.
Um soldado contratado por concurso que queira servir, disposto a receber o treinamento e ficar dois-três anos vale muito mais do que um montão de convocados que ganharam salário de fome e não ficam um ano. Sem contar que existe a possibilidade de flexibilizar a contratação ao longo do ano e período.
Assim, um individuo que servisse a USAF, por exemplo (não me refiro aqui, claro, a oficiais) poderia aprender programação de computadores, manutenção/montagem de radares, turbinas, etc...
Era um caminho para profissionalização do(a) recruta no serviço, preparando-o também para progredir posteriormente na vida civil, ao mesmo tempo formando uma reserva altamente capacitada.
Wingate
Editado pela última vez por Wingate em Ter Abr 07, 2015 9:31 am, em um total de 1 vez.
-
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 2427
- Registrado em: Sex Mai 18, 2012 6:12 pm
- Agradeceu: 40 vezes
- Agradeceram: 205 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
Uma pá uma enxada e um cursinho de pedreiro.Wingate escreveu:Lembro-me bem de que, quando o serviço militar nos EUA tornou-se voluntário (a partir de 1972, se não me falha a memória), um dos principais pontos de atração para recrutamento de pessoal eram os cursos profissionalizantes que as diversas forças ofereciam.Bourne escreveu:Depois do fim da Guerra Fria e ascensão da guerra tecnologia pouquíssimos países mantém serviço militar obrigatório. Salvo quem está em vias de guerra como Coreia, irã e Rússia, mas é pesado para formar soldado que vai ser enviado para batalha de fato a qualquer momento. Achei até estranho que nem china e Índia adotam conscrição. Preciso confirmar.
Um soldado contratado por concurso que queira servir, disposto a receber o treinamento e ficar dois-três anos vale muito mais do que um montão de convocados que ganharam salário de fome e não ficam um ano. Sem contar que existe a possibilidade de flexibilizar a contratação ao longo do ano e período.
Assim, um individuo que servisse a USAF, por exemplo (não me refiro aqui, claro, a oficiais) poderia aprender programação de computadores, manutenção/montagem de radares, turbinas, etc...
Era um caminho para profissionalização do(a) recruta, preparando-o também para progredir na vida civil.
O que se oferece aos nossos jovens hoje?
Wingate
- Wingate
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 5130
- Registrado em: Sex Mai 05, 2006 10:16 am
- Localização: Crato/CE
- Agradeceu: 819 vezes
- Agradeceram: 239 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
No meu tempo era possível obter a carteira de habilitação. Não sei se isto ainda ocorre.Lirolfuti escreveu:Uma pá uma enxada e um cursinho de pedreiro.Wingate escreveu: Lembro-me bem de que, quando o serviço militar nos EUA tornou-se voluntário (a partir de 1972, se não me falha a memória), um dos principais pontos de atração para recrutamento de pessoal eram os cursos profissionalizantes que as diversas forças ofereciam.
Assim, um individuo que servisse a USAF, por exemplo (não me refiro aqui, claro, a oficiais) poderia aprender programação de computadores, manutenção/montagem de radares, turbinas, etc...
Era um caminho para profissionalização do(a) recruta, preparando-o também para progredir na vida civil.
O que se oferece aos nossos jovens hoje?
Wingate
Wingate
- Bourne
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 21087
- Registrado em: Dom Nov 04, 2007 11:23 pm
- Localização: Campina Grande do Sul
- Agradeceu: 3 vezes
- Agradeceram: 21 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
No modelo norte-americano possui um programa de capacitação para entrar na vida civil.
Por que os estudos indicavam que trariam pessoal mais interessado e dedicado, mas o serviço militar era um substituto ruim para vida profissional civil. A solução era compensar com mais educação e outras compensações. Assim o curso profissionalizante seria uma das compensações, mas passava ajudar a pagar um curso superior, vantagens em financiamento para compra de imóveis, plano de saúde, etc... E se o soldado fosse para combate estava feito na vida.
Além do jovem ter a opção de tentar seguir na carreira como sargento ou até oficial.
Por que os estudos indicavam que trariam pessoal mais interessado e dedicado, mas o serviço militar era um substituto ruim para vida profissional civil. A solução era compensar com mais educação e outras compensações. Assim o curso profissionalizante seria uma das compensações, mas passava ajudar a pagar um curso superior, vantagens em financiamento para compra de imóveis, plano de saúde, etc... E se o soldado fosse para combate estava feito na vida.
Além do jovem ter a opção de tentar seguir na carreira como sargento ou até oficial.
- Clermont
- Sênior
- Mensagens: 8842
- Registrado em: Sáb Abr 26, 2003 11:16 pm
- Agradeceu: 632 vezes
- Agradeceram: 644 vezes
Re: Crise nas forças armadas mundiais
E quem quer saber de exército profissional?
Um exército profissional jamais poderia ter o tamanho do atual Exército brasileiro. Seria preciso ter menos brigadas, menos batalhões, menos regimentos, menos grupos.
E isso quer dizer, menos generais, menos coronéis, menos cadetes da AMAN.
Alguém acredita que uma coisa dessas seja popular dentro do Alto-Comando?
Mas não é só isso.
Um exército profissional também não interessa aos políticos, em especial os paroquianos. Menos quartéis significa menos atividades econômicas em vários municípios. E menos desfiles de 7 de Setembro.
Além do mais, quem vai matar mosquitos da dengue? Quem vai tapar buracos nas estradas? Quem vai asfaltar com custo zero de mão-de-obra (recruta é mais ou menos como um servo de gleba medieval prestando corvéia ao seu senhor).
![Imagem](http://www.sorocabafacil.com.br/img2015/marco_2015/dengue303.jpg)
Vejam estes soldados do Exército. Imaginem que eles tivessem três anos de serviço voluntário nas costas. Soldados capazes de lançar uma granada de mão numa cesta de basquete a vinte metros de distância. Capazes de abater um inimigo a 200 metros, com um só tiro de fuzil. Capazes de resistir a uma carga-suicida de guerrilheiros disparando AKMs em automático total, sem pensar em correr. Especialistas em aproveitar cada haste de capim no terreno como cobertura.
Você vai passar três anos ensinando isso a um soldado para, depois, mandá-lo matar mosquitos da Dengue?
Realmente, a quem interessa um exército profissional no Brasil?
Um exército profissional jamais poderia ter o tamanho do atual Exército brasileiro. Seria preciso ter menos brigadas, menos batalhões, menos regimentos, menos grupos.
E isso quer dizer, menos generais, menos coronéis, menos cadetes da AMAN.
Alguém acredita que uma coisa dessas seja popular dentro do Alto-Comando?
Mas não é só isso.
Um exército profissional também não interessa aos políticos, em especial os paroquianos. Menos quartéis significa menos atividades econômicas em vários municípios. E menos desfiles de 7 de Setembro.
Além do mais, quem vai matar mosquitos da dengue? Quem vai tapar buracos nas estradas? Quem vai asfaltar com custo zero de mão-de-obra (recruta é mais ou menos como um servo de gleba medieval prestando corvéia ao seu senhor).
![Imagem](http://www.sorocabafacil.com.br/img2015/marco_2015/dengue303.jpg)
Vejam estes soldados do Exército. Imaginem que eles tivessem três anos de serviço voluntário nas costas. Soldados capazes de lançar uma granada de mão numa cesta de basquete a vinte metros de distância. Capazes de abater um inimigo a 200 metros, com um só tiro de fuzil. Capazes de resistir a uma carga-suicida de guerrilheiros disparando AKMs em automático total, sem pensar em correr. Especialistas em aproveitar cada haste de capim no terreno como cobertura.
Você vai passar três anos ensinando isso a um soldado para, depois, mandá-lo matar mosquitos da Dengue?
Realmente, a quem interessa um exército profissional no Brasil?