data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3f0f/d3f0f9044d05579b8353b88663f853771f97baa9" alt="Neutral :|"
abs
Moderador: Conselho de Moderação
pode deixar meu Caro companheiro!!!!!...rs...FCarvalho escreveu:cassio meu caro amigo... por favor isso aqui é um fórum sério. Pare de ficar trazendo para cá coisas que distraem e nebulizam as discussões...![]()
abs
me lembro de quando li esse artigo...a uns dois dias atrás não me lembro bem, até pensei em postar aqui, mas mudei de ideia, por que no meu entender o autor...busca poucos elementos palpáveis a nossa realidade para construir uma preocupação que é legitima mas que falta "sustança."FCarvalho escreveu:O BRASIL PRECISA ACORDAR PARA O TERROR
http://www.defesaaereanaval.com.br/o-br ... -o-terror/
Será?![]()
![]()
abs
Brazil announces massive reforestation and renewable energy plan with US
President Dilma Rousseff pledged to restore 12m hectares of deforested land and increase renewable energy use by 2030 as part of climate partnership with
Suzanne Goldenberg and agencies
Tuesday 30 June 2015 17.17 BST
Barack Obama and Dilma Rousseff put climate change at the top of their agenda at their bilateral meeting on Tuesday, with the US and Brazil agreeing to get up to 20% of their electricity from renewable power by 2030.
Brazil also committed to restore up to 12m hectares of forest – an area about the size of England or Pennsylvania – in another attempt to reduce the carbon pollution that causes climate change.
The White House said the initiatives were part of a new US-Brazil climate partnership, loosely modelled on the historic US-China agreement reached during Obama’s visit to Beijing last November, which are intended to build momentum for a global deal to fight climate change in Paris at the end of the year.
The pledge will require the US to triple its production of wind and solar power and other renewable energies. Brazil will need to double its production of clean energy. The figures do not include hydro power.
“This is a big deal,” Brian Deese, the White House climate adviser, told a call with reporters.
He said putting climate change at the centre of the US-Brazil relationship would help drive action on climate change. “We are shining a splotlight on the issues and eleveating the conversation around them,” he said.
Rich and poor countries alike have been putting forth their commitments, known as nationally determined contributions, to reduce emissions as part of the treaty, which world leaders hope to finalize later this year in Paris.
Brazil also plans to expand renewable energy sources other than hydropower to between 28% and 33% of its total energy mix by 2030.
And in the electricity sector, the US and Brazil jointly announced intentions to increase their share of renewable, non-hydropower sources to 20% by 2030. Deese said boosting renewables that high in the US would be dependent on controversial power plant emission limits that the Obama administration has proposed.
“We believe that this is an ambitious target, but one that is actually achievable and will create new low-cost opportunities for the American economy,” Deese said. “To achieve it, we’re going to have to continue to hit our marks in implementing the regulations we’ve identified to date.”
The US has already announced its full commitment to the climate treaty: a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions of up to 28% by 2025, compared to 2005 levels. But a key sticking point in the climate treaty has been whether developing nations like Brazil will be willing to make substantial contributions. Poorer nations have balked, arguing that industrialized nations that have polluted more historically bear more of the responsibility for curbing climate change.
The announcement comes on the second day of Rousseff’s visit to Washington, where she met with Obama in the Oval Office on Tuesday morning.
In their visit, Obama and Rousseff have been working to show they’ve moved beyond tensions sparked by the revelation nearly two years ago that the US was spying on Rousseff. She canceled a planned state visit in response. Officials in both countries say neither leader is interested in rehashing the spying issues this week and instead want to focus on ways to deepen cooperation.
The Associated Press contributed to this report
Fonte http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/j ... ble-energy
A discussão é eficiência e eficácia da estrutura de estado e se cumprem seu objetivo. Não quantos funcionários ou o valor nominal dos salários. A discussão é muito mais complicada.andrefmz escreveu:Interessante este lado.
http://m.jb.com.br/sociedade-aberta/not ... spionagem/
mmatuso escreveu:Lendo os jornais hoje fiquei contente em saber que a Dilma engoliu o orgulho comunista e for pedir conselhos para o Obama, mesmo que esse não seja um republicano.
Provavelmente o melhor conselho que ele deve ter dado é que devemos nos distanciar dos nefastos comunos-bolivarianos para atingirmos o caminho da luz.
Quando eles querem algo e eles puxam o saco mesmo... não se lembram da recepção ao FHC em Washington?prp escreveu:Uma repórter da Globo News passou uma grande vergonha agora, lá em suas terras favoritas!
Na coletiva da qual participam os dois presidentes, ela perguntou a Dilma como a presidenta lidava com o fato de saber que os EUA consideram nosso país como uma potência REGIONAL.
Obama interrompeu, pediu licença para responder à pergunta feita a Dilma, e disse à repórter brasileira:
Nós consideramos o Brasil como uma potência MUNDIAL, e não como uma potência regional, como vc destacou.