Moderador: Conselho de Moderação
Acho que eu já tinha postado um artigo que dizia que a 1 divisão de blindados da Inglaterra deve se retirar em 2020.cabeça de martelo escreveu:Olha que sim, olha que sim, o problema foi com a crise internacional e não com a guerra em si. Estamos a falar de um país que ainda mantém milhares de militares na Alemanha. Especuladores do mundo, uni-vos!
http://dn.sapo.pt/inicio/economia/inter ... id=1687792
cabeça de martelo escreveu:3000 militares ainda é alguma coisa, especialmente com umas Forças Armadas anãs como as Portuguesas.
Brasil rumo as Malvinas em 2020 . Só se conseguisses entrar na ESE no na Academia. Eu quando percebi da quantidade de militares a tentar entrar para a ESE preferi vir para a vida civil.P44 escreveu:Mas agora ao fim de 6 anos vens para a rua, certo?
Olha, eu é que já estou velho, senão candidatava-me
Eu não quero o Brasil se metendo em robada por causa das ilhas Falklands.FOXTROT escreveu:Um dia a Europa teria que sentir o que é crise, nós que sempre vivemos na crise um dia teríamos que ter abundância, parece que começaram as inversões.
Da minha parte espero ver a Inglaterra ainda com menos forças
Saudações
![[029]](./images/smilies/029.gif){kind=small}
http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedin ... alklands-0Increasing Military Strength. Though Argentina recognizes that it is no match for the British military, this hasn’t stopped it from augmenting its forces and taking provocative action. In February 2010 the Argentine warship ARA Drummond, a French-built corvette, was ten miles inside the disputed “oil zone” and 65 miles off the islands. The British destroyer HMS York had been monitoring this incursion and radioed her to change course, which she finally did. Argentine sources said Drummond made an “innocent navigational blunder.”6
On 29 May 2010, Argentine Defense Minister Nilda Garré announced that four navy patrol vessels are under construction in a joint venture with Chile and will be sent to the South Atlantic to demonstrate the willingness of Argentina to exercise sovereignty over the Falkland Islands.7 These stealth-designed ships are 240 feet in length with a 50-foot beam, 21 knot speed, a thirty-man crew, a helipad, and the ability to be configured with various combat systems.
On 4 June 2010 Defense Minister Garré announced that her country is seriously considering incorporating nuclear-powered vessels into its navy. Argentina has constructed small nuclear reactors for their power-generation stations and has the capability to make good on its words. Garré went on to say, “We want to recover those scientific, technological and industrial capabilities Argentina once had; Argentina can’t be left out of the development of technology and the technological edge we had in the region.”
The most recent development was reported on 1 September 2010 after Garré announced, in a conference with political science students at Di Tella University, a 50 percent increase in the Argentine defense budget. It has shrunken over the years she said, as a result of the “defeat in the Falkland/Malvinas war, social incompatibility with the military institutions following the war, military dictatorship, and the 2001 collapse of the Argentine economy.”9
By 2020 Brazil will have likely developed its own nuclear-powered attack submarine. I learned in my meeting with retired Argentine Navy Rear Admiral Pedro de la Fuente and former Fleet Commander-and-Chief that years ago Brazil had invited Argentina to join it in this venture. Argentina had declined. When Brazil completes this costly project it is unlikely to share it with its neighbor; however, it may be willing to provide Argentina with underwater surveillance in the event another military conflict occurs with Britain. Since Brazil supports Argentina’s claim to the Falklands, it may even be willing to provide military support, along with other South American countries. In February 2010 Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez said: “The English are still threatening Argentina. Things have changed. We are no longer in 1982. If conflict breaks out, be sure Argentina will not be alone like it was back then.”
The danger in the Argentine strategy is that the economic sanctions and saber-rattling don’t lead to compromise, but rather directly to a hot war.
