data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f30d4/f30d437e540d930d44432345caa5de2eb9b6a051" alt="Confused :?"
Isso não é um (1), é a cabeça deles que funciona assim mesmo.
Moderador: Conselho de Moderação
soultrain escreveu:China’s PLA Navy Gets an LCAC
Well look at that, the Chinese navy has got itself a Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC). More photos of new additions to China’s growing fleet at Information Dissemination. If China is serious about building an amphibious warfare capability, I’d be curious to know what their answer is to the anti-access challenge. My guess is they don’t have one. Precision guided weapons work both ways, of course, and our battle networks are pretty good at long-range targeting.
When RAND recently wargamed a Chinese invasion of Taiwan they found that a Chinese amphibious assault could become a “bloody fiasco” in the face of determined Taiwanese resistance. Still, I’m sure there is some Chinese think tank working vigorously on an AirSea Battle concept that envisions the PLA navy using their new LCACs.
– Greg Grant
May 12th, 2010 | China Rising | Comments (13)
Read more: http://defensetech.org/#ixzz0nqRckAMs
Que diferente tem o J-10 naval pro normal? Aparentemente, nessa foto e nessa distância, não dá para distinguir nada.P44 escreveu:Thursday, May 13, 2010
Chinese Naval J-10 Spotted in the open
Days after the Chinese Naval J-11 spotted in the open , now the naval J-10 is also spotted.
de
http://china-defense.blogspot.com/
Nã, contra o RU é que era. O Brasil é demasiado brando para entrar em guerra seja com quem for. Basta eles chegarem a Londres e começarem a ameaçar comprar algum clube de futebol que há guerra...quer dizer isso já não era novo, esquece.talharim escreveu:Eu particularmente se fosse um estrategista chines optaria por causar uma guerra contra o Brasil.