Fórum Defesa Brasil

Reginaldo Bacchi escreveu:

prp escreveu:Também achei muito barato, 25 mirreis para 4 refeições é muito em conta.

Eu não estou entendendo a relação!

Quanto vale o mirreis em relação ao real, atualmente?

Quando o cruzeiro foi introduzido na decada de 40, 1 cruzeiro valia 1 mil reis.

Aliás, alem do mirreis, as vezes o real tem equivalencia a uma outra moesda brasileira chama pau!!!

Bacchi

FoxHound escreveu:Makarov citou como exemplo o carro de combate T-90S, que, com exceção da torre, ainda parece insatisfatório para a Defesa. Ele também confirmou que o departamento militar se recusa a comprar o veículo de combate de infantaria BMD-4 porque "não há nenhuma proteção, está tudo “acima” e custa mais do que um tanque de combate”.

RAFAEL Unveil a Light, Affordable Member of the Spike Missile Family

Rafael is expanding the Spike missile family with the lightweight, man-portable Spike SR, a ‘fire and forget’ short range guided missile enabling infantrymen to engage a wide range of targets with high precision, from ranges up to 800 meters. Spike SR is positioned between the Spike MR (medium-range) weapon and the unguided Matador multipurpose rocket, offering the advantages of both weapons for infantry-relevant ranges, at a full system weight of less than 10 kg., therefore reducing load by 3 percent.



RAFAEL has completed the program’s feasibility testing and is now seeking international customers and partners to pursue full-scale development. The company positions the new weapon at a level well above RAFAEL’s own Matador rocket system, Talley SMAW or Saab AT4, as well as the Saab MBT LAW. According to Rafael, despite the much improved precision, performance and probability of kill, Spike SR will be slightly more expensive than those other unguided rockets.

The guidance system provides the distinctive advantage of the Spike SR – a strapdown camera located at the fin providing both target acquisition sensor and a seeker, employed for in-flight guidance. Spike SR carries a multi-purpose tandem shaped-charge warhead with blast-fragmentation effect, offering capabilities similar to those of the Spike LR missile.

The seeker tracks the target sending flight control commands to the aerodynamic controls, keeping the missile on its flight course to hit the target with high precision. The missile offers very high-hit probability, against point targets, as well as moving targets. Its target acquisition functionality enables Spike SR to operate in both day and night modes, without a dedicated magnifying day/night optics or laser rangefinder, thus saving significant additional weight, power consumption, logistics complexity and costs.

Ontem, 15 de fevereiro, o ministro da Defesa do Peru, Alberto Otárola, se reuniu com o titular da pasta no Brasil, Celso Amorim, com quem analisou assuntos de segurança nas fronteiras e uma possível compra de equipamentos militares brasileiros.

No Rio, o ministro peruano conheceu também um centro de alta tecnologia do Exército, no qual são fabricados os veículos de combate 4×4 Gaúcho, desenvolvidos pelo Brasil em parceria com a Argentina.

O Gaúcho é oficialmente conhecido como “Viatura Leve de Emprego Geral Aerotransportável” e é fruto do intercâmbio científico-tecnológico entre os exércitos do Brasil e da Argentina.

O veículo foi projetado para cumprir missões de transporte de material, ressuprimento, evacuação de feridos, reconhecimento, comando e controle. Este conceito não teve aceitação em países desenvolvidos, pois a ausência de proteção para a tripulação foi considerada fator crítico para os cenários projetados.

Reginaldo Bacchi escreveu:

FoxHound escreveu:Makarov citou como exemplo o carro de combate T-90S, que, com exceção da torre, ainda parece insatisfatório para a Defesa. Ele também confirmou que o departamento militar se recusa a comprar o veículo de combate de infantaria BMD-4 porque "não há nenhuma proteção, está tudo “acima” e custa mais do que um tanque de combate”.

O que quer dizer: "... "não há nenhuma proteção, está tudo “acima” ...".

Esta frase não faz o minimo sentido para mim.

Mas, você, Foxhound, como arauto das forças armadas russas, talves possa esclarecer.

Bacchi

felipexion escreveu: [
Notícia traduzida para o português pelo tradutor Google.
Pode ser que a frase seja fruto de mais um dos erros grotesco que o tradutor comete.

Túlio escreveu:Não me parece 'googlada' não, segui o link e foi dar em um blog que não cita o texto original, senão eu traduziria (se fosse em Inglês porque em Russo é sodas)...

Rogozin launches twitter salvo against defense officials
by Alina Lobzina at 15/02/2012 17:01

A long-running spat among Russian defense officials resulted in Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin launching a twitter attack against the chief of the country’s armed forces yesterday.

General Nikolai Makarov, head of the Russian General Staff, became a target for Rogozin’s criticisms after he shared his opinion on the quality of locally manufactured armaments.

“Our military commanders shouldn’t argue with the military’s science and industry divisions via the media. There are many other ways to solve these issues,” Rogozin tweeted on Tuesday.



Weapons fail to meet army standards

Makarov said the Russian weapons failed to meet the General Staff’s standards. “We have ceased the purchase of armed vehicles. We gave engineers five years to design new kinds of military weapons,” he said yesterday, Kommersant reported.

Weak personnel shielding is a common problem for both of Russian newly developed armed vehicles – the T-90C tank and BMD-4 armed personnel carrier, Makarov said.

The only part of T-90C tank that meets modern requirements is its turret, according to Makarov, adding that the machine is not satisfactory in general.

Earlier, the tank was criticized for its gun, weak engine and the lack of automatic transmission. According to Oleg Siyenko, Uralvagonzavod’s director general, it was designed without funding from the Defense Ministry.

And probably the most remarkable thing about BMD-4 is its price. “BMD-4 is just another version of BMD-3, but it costs more than a tank,” Makarov said. “We’ve never considered [buying] this machine.”



Years of neglect

The sad state of affairs has become a result of 15 years of neglect of the country’s defense industry, which began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, according to a research fellow at the Strategies and Technologies Center, Andrei Frolov.

“In the West, the production of new experimental designs has never stopped over this period,” Frolov told BBC Russian service. “The equipment we’ve got was designed in the 60s to 80s, and there are either no new designs at all, or they are not enough and are rarely used,” Frolov said. He also added that Western military equipment has been tested by wars, while Russia didn’t have that many occasions for this.

Rogozin, however, said the rearmament of the army and the navy is set to continue as it was planned.

“The head of the General Staff is not the only person to decide on weapons and armament purchases,” he twitted. According to Kommersant’s source in the Defense Ministry, purchases are planned by the General Staff together with various branches of the military.