PRick escreveu:[quote ="rcolistete"]
Skyway escreveu:
Perfeito de novo Luis!
Olá pessoal,
Se isso é perfeito então é melhor consultar um dicionário...
Os 3 Eurocanards (Gripen, Eurofighter e Rafale) tem batido em dogfight os caças dos EUA como F-15 e F-18 E/F. Isso é relatado em vários exercícios multinacionais. O Rafale tem metade do raio de curvatura do F-15...
O radar do Gripen NG e Rafale para o FX-2, em 2014, será AESA. Não dá para saber se o APG-79 AESA do Super Hornet será melhor ou pior que o RBE-2 AESA e o radar AESA do Gripen NG.
E o F-18 E/F não ganha do Rafale em alcance.
[]s, Roberto
Essa é mais uma das lendas urbanas, dogfight é uma combate realizado, com velocidades entre 500 e 1000 km/h, e nessa área, o Rafale dá uma surra no F-18E, até o Gripen é bem melhor que o Super Lento.
O radar do F-18E tem um defeito muito grave, não lock para baixo, porque sua antena é muito inclinada para cima, pelo que andei lendo. E não é superior de modo algum ao RBE-AESA.
[ ]´s[/quote]
Sua invencoes sao hilarias! Uma das missao primarias do SH block II + APG-79 eh justo a deteccao e interceptacao de misseis cruise voando baixo.
Agora fiquei curioso...nao era essa a solucao que a Dassault adotaria para poder colocar uma antena um pouco maior no pequeno nariz do Rafale? Nao era essa a solucao que vc alardeou aqui? E que isso ajudaria a diminuir o RCS frontaldo caca frances?
WVR: no limits AOA + ITR 40 graus/s + JHMCS + AIM-9X
> limits AOA + ITR 30/35 graus/s + Magic 2 ou MICA IR
BVR: APG-79 + AIM-120C-7/D
> RBE02 + MICA EM/IR
Super Hornet: First look – First shot – First kill
Navy Details New Super Hornet Capabilities
Feb 25, 2007
By David A. Fulghum
(...) Many Navy and industry planners hope that the merits of the F/A-18E/F's advanced systems,
which can detect, identify and attack new classes of very small targets, will help it survive any congressional predilection to trim upgrades that are crucial to the program. Moreover, the Super Hornet equipped with a fifth-generation radar and integrated sensor suite is expected to be a tough competitor for international fighter sales. The advanced package has already resulted in a likely sale of 24 aircraft to Australia and is being pitched for large fighter buys planned by Japan and India.
The newest version of the Boeing Super Hornet, equipped with an advanced, Raytheon-built APG-79 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar,
can spot small targets--even stealthy cruise missiles--at ranges great enough to allow an effective defense. Navy officials are loath to talk with any detail about the metrics of electronic attacks and admit only to "extremely significant tactical ranges" for EA effects against air-to-air and surface-to-air radars, Gaddis says. However, other Pentagon and aerospace industry officials say that while air-to-air missiles are struggling to reach the 60-100-mi.-range mark, some sophisticated electronic attack effects can reach well beyond that.
"That's at least 100 mi.," says a long-time Pentagon radar specialist. "There are different forms of electronic attack, and they include putting false targets or altered ranges, speeds and positions of real targets into the enemy's radars. Those are effects that require less power than jamming and therefore are effective at longer ranges."
An industry official with insight into AESA development says that the ability to affect a foe is limited by the enemy radar's range because the signal has to be captured, manipulated and returned. Therefore, long-range ground-based radars and even AWACS radars could be electronically attacked at ranges well over 100 mi. For air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles, the techniques would be the same but the effective ranges would be shorter.
The U.S. Navy's first AESA-equipped squadron has been developing combat procedures as the unit works up to its first deployment. VFA-213, flying all two-seat F/A-18F models, already has been through training cycles at NAS Fallon, Calif.'s "Strike U." (...)
